<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kevin Vogelsang &#187; Simplicity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kevinvogelsang.com/tag/simplicity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kevinvogelsang.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Simplicity vs Complexity</title>
		<link>http://kevinvogelsang.com/2010/03/simplicity-vs-complexity/</link>
		<comments>http://kevinvogelsang.com/2010/03/simplicity-vs-complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Vogelsang</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kevinvogelsang.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We tend to push simplicity: "all things should be as simple as they can be."  And this probably best.  It's harder to mess up simple things. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both are important.  They are the two sides of elegance.</p>
<p>We tend to push simplicity: &#8220;all things should be as simple as they can be.&#8221;  And this is probably best.  It&#8217;s harder to mess up simple things.  Think about architecture.  It&#8217;s hard to go wrong with columns and arches and domes (assuming they are constructed properly).  But, ultimately, it&#8217;s about elegance, not simplicity.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Very few people are skilled enough in an art to highlight complexity.  But, it exists and it&#8217;s part of the world.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It&#8217;s also beautiful.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Tree" src="http://www.eastgwillimbury.ca/Assets/Environment/Sustainability/Green+Tree+Pic.jpg" alt="" width="548" height="365" /></p>
<p>-Kevin<br />
3.5.2010</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e613d33b-2c06-4e24-9f95-7aed0574e7d8/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e613d33b-2c06-4e24-9f95-7aed0574e7d8" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kevinvogelsang.com/2010/03/simplicity-vs-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

